Home / Publications / Research / Let the Market Decide: The Case Against Mandatory Pick-and-Pay
- Media Releases
- Research
- |
Let the Market Decide: The Case Against Mandatory Pick-and-Pay
Summary:
| Citation | Hunter, Lawson, and Michael Trebilcock. 2014. Let the Market Decide: The Case Against Mandatory Pick-and-Pay. ###. Toronto: C.D. Howe Institute. |
| Page Title: | Let the Market Decide: The Case Against Mandatory Pick-and-Pay – C.D. Howe Institute |
| Article Title: | Let the Market Decide: The Case Against Mandatory Pick-and-Pay |
| URL: | https://cdhowe.org/publication/let-market-decide-case-against-mandatory-pick-and-pay/ |
| Published Date: | September 24, 2014 |
| Accessed Date: | April 17, 2026 |
Outline
Outline
Authors
Related Topics
For all media inquiries, including requests for reports or interviews:
A proposal by the Canadian Radio-Television and Telecommunications Commission (CRTC) to mandate “pick-and-pay” television offerings for Canadians is deeply misguided, according to a report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Let the Market Decide: The Case Against Mandatory Pick-and-Pay,” authors Lawson Hunter, Edward Iacobucci and Michael Trebilcock find that mandating consumers to be able to subscribe to pay and specialty services on a service-by-service basis would be a slippery slope to still more regulation, and would become irrelevant at best in the ongoing telecom revolution.
Related Publications
- Videos
Why the $10/day Childcare Program Isn’t Working and How to Fix It | Parisa Mahboubi & Tingting Zhang
- Research
- Podcasts


