A New Blueprint for Ontario’s Electricity Market


Beer, Butter, and Barristers: How Canadian Governments Put Cartels Before Consumers
Governments in Canada maintain monopolies in certain sectors of the economy through regulations that advance private interests at an unreasonable cost to consumers, according to a report from the C.D. Howe Institute. In “Beer, Butter, and Barristers: How Canadian Governments Put Cartels before Consumers,” authors Robert Mysicka and Marty McKendry criticize the view, established by […]Mergers by Choice, Not Edict: Reforming Ontario’s Electricity Distribution Policy


The real risky lender: Financial Post Op-Ed
Posted in the National Post on March 20, 2013
By Finn Poschmann and Philippe Bergevin
The irony of Finance Minister Jim Flaherty’s hounding of bank mortgage lenders, for advertising competitive market terms, should be lost on none. Perhaps he believes lenders will extend daft, risky loans, or that low market interest rates will tease borrowers into taking on debt they can ill afford. In Ottawa, however, risky lending begins at home: Federal Crown financial corporations, for which Mr. Flaherty’s government is responsible, beat the market competition every time.
Today’s budget, and the next one, are opportunities to do something about it. By expanding on Budget 2012, which took steps toward reining in the market‘…
Putting the Market Back in Dairy Marketing


Closing the Back Door Route to Cartels: The Need to Clarify the Regulated Conduct Doctrine
C.D. Howe Institute Competition Policy Council
The Competition Bureau should actively engage in competition matters in regulated sectors of the economy, where anti-competitive conduct may be protected by government legislation or authority. This is the consensus view of the C.D. Howe Institute’s Competition Policy Council, which held its fourth meeting on November 8, 2012.
Members of the Council held that the Bureau should more clearly delineate the scope of anti-competitive practices that it sees as protected by provincial or federal legislation or delegated authority; and it should be directly engaged in regulatory decisions that potentially impair competition. As well, the Bureau should contribute independent analysis…
The New Multilateralism: The Shift to Private Global Regulation


Breaking Free: A Post-mercantilist Trade and Productivity Agenda for Canada


A Taxing Dilemma: Assessing the Impact of Tax and Price Changes on the Tobacco Market


Free Air Canada from legal burdens: Financial Post Op-Ed
Published in the Financial Post on April 3, 2012
By Benjamin Dachis
The recent failure of Aveos Fleet Performance Inc., the company that provides heavy maintenance services for Air Canada, has led to a House of Commons investigation into whether Air Canada violated the law that made Air Canada a private airline. This law is just one example of the backward Canadian aviation policies that the government should repeal.
The federal government privatized Air Canada in 1988 with the Air Canada Public Participation Act. The act requires that Air Canada maintain operational and overhaul centres in Winnipeg, Montreal and Mississauga, keep its head office in Montreal and offer services in English or French.
In 2004,…
At the Crossroads: New Ideas for Charity Finance in Canada


Unclogging the Pipes: Pipeline Reviews and Energy Policy

