Railroad Blues: How to Get Canada’s Rail Policy Back on Track


The Value of Copyrights in Recorded Music: Terrestrial Radio and Beyond


Telecommunications and Broadcast Policy in the New Technological Age
Report of the C.D. Howe Institute Competition Policy Council
The legislative, regulatory and institutional framework governing the Canadian telecommunications and broadcast sectors is outdated to the point of dysfunction, and requires a fundamental overhaul. This is the consensus view of the C.D. Howe Institute’s Competition Policy Council, which held its eighth meeting on October 23, 2014.
The Competition Policy Council comprises top-ranked academics and practitioners active in the field of competition policy. The Council, chaired by Finn Poschmann, Vice President, Policy Analysis, at the C.D. Howe Institute, provides analysis of emerging competition policy issues. Professor Edward Iacobucci, Osler Chair in Business Law…
Who Watches the Watchmen? The Role of the Self-Regulator


Let the Market Decide: The Case Against Mandatory Pick-and-Pay


Rethinking Ontario’s Electricity System with Consumers in Mind


Uncorking a Strange Brew: The Need for More Competition in Ontario’s Alcoholic Beverage Retailing System


Cross-Border Price Regulation: Anti-Competition Policy?
Report of the C.D. Howe Institute Competition Policy Council
A recent federal proposal to legislate against cross-border price discrimination is profoundly wrong-headed in approach and should not proceed. This is the consensus view of the C.D. Howe Institute’s Competition Policy Council, which held its seventh meeting on April 25, 2014.
The Competition Policy Council comprises top-ranked academics and practitioners active in the field of competition policy. The Council, chaired by Finn Poschmann, Vice President, Research, at the C.D. Howe Institute, provides analysis of emerging competition policy issues. Professor Edward Iacobucci, Osler Chair in Business Law at the University of Toronto and Competition Policy Scholar at…
Sticker Shock: The Causes of the Canada-US Price Differential


Registering in Harmony: The Case for Pan-Canadian Corporate Registration


Full Throttle: Reforming Canada’s Aviation Policy


Who Gets In? Class Actions and Indirect Purchasers in Competition Law
Report of the C.D. Howe Institute Competition Policy Council
The Supreme Court will rule on Thursday, October 31, in landmark Competition Act decisions. The key question before the Court is, when anticompetitive cartel behaviour is alleged in class action proceedings, should indirect purchasers, such as retailers and end consumers, have standing to sue for damages? Given the likelihood that awards to individual class members might be very small, or zero, even should a suit succeed, it appears that deterrence, not compensation, should be the aim of law and policy. This is the consensus view of the C.D. Howe Institute’s Competition Policy Council, which held its sixth meeting on October 24, 2013.
The Competition…