William Robson: Government Spending Looks Cheap Today — But That Won’t Last – Financial Post Op-ed

Looked at one way, the federal government’s recent musings about spending tens — even hundreds — of billions more dollars on a raft of new programs seem weird. Nobody thought we could afford such a binge before COVID hammered our economy. How is it a great idea afterward?

Look at it another way, however, and the magical thinking in Ottawa is easier to understand. The crisis pushed the federal government’s revenues down and its spending up. Directionally, that is fine. But a mind-boggling two-thirds hike in program expenses this year has driven the apparent tax cost of a dollar of program spending through the floor. Federal largesse has never looked cheaper.

How cheap? July’s fiscal snapshot suggested Ottawa’s revenue,…

Canada’s Foggy Economic and Fiscal Future

Canada in ‘Economic and Fiscal Fog,’ Needs Real Debate on Future Path Canada needs a national debate over its economic and fiscal future, according to Don Drummond, former chief economist for TD Bank. Drummond lays out four scenarios for Canada’s fiscal future, each targeting a deficit and debt track into the 2030s, and calls for […]

La bidenomie et nous – La Presse Opinion

Bidenomie, n. f. Mot-valise formé par la contraction des mots Biden et économie.

Il est opportun d’introduire ce néologisme pour explorer ce que le candidat démocrate à la présidence des États-Unis compte faire de l’économie de notre puissant voisin. La Bidenomics est d’ailleurs le dernier terme à la mode dans les médias de langue anglaise pour désigner son programme économique.

Deux mises en garde s’imposent avant de plonger dans le sujet. Premièrement, le président propose, mais le Congrès dispose en matières législative et budgétaire, prescrit la Constitution américaine. Si le Sénat ne tombe pas aux mains des démocrates, on peut parier que plusieurs ambitions de la Bidenomie s’échoueront sur les récifs…

Jenkins, Kronick – Health And The Economy – With Numbers

From: Paul Jenkins and Jeremy M. Kronick To: Canadian policymakers Date: October 5, 2020 Re: Health and the Economy – With Numbers When the pandemic nature of the COVID-19 virus was finally recognized, Canada acted boldly to contain and control its spread. We didn’t know as much as we know now, and as such we were forced into unmeasurable […]

Busted Budgets: Canada’s Senior Governments Can’t Stick to Their Fiscal Plans

Canada’s federal, provincial and territorial governments have spent a combined total of $97 billion more than they promised in their budgets since 2000, a figure set to worsen with the advent of the COVID-19 pandemic. Since 2000, Canada’s senior governments have spent $97 billion – some $2,600 per Canadian – more than they budgeted and […]

Luc Godbout – A Quebec Model For A Fiscal Anchor

From: Luc Godbout To: The Hon. Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Finance Date: September 21, 2020 Re: A Quebec model for a fiscal anchor It’s important for governments to have fiscal targets. It’s a credibility issue for federal government, not only with the rating agencies, but also with the public. To guard against a downgrade of rating agencies, the federal […]

What Will Stop Ottawa’s Debt Binge? – Globe And Mail Op-ed

The $343-billion deficit for this fiscal year, announced in July by former finance minister Bill Morneau in his fiscal snapshot, was shocking at the time. Partly it was the number itself, which implied that debt would top $1-trillion before year-end. And because, with no budget or even a fiscal plan out of Ottawa this year, the tally was incomplete. Now Mr. Morneau is gone, and his replacement, Chrystia Freeland, has signalled at least another $40-billion in new spending – which will push the borrowing higher yet.

The 2015 election commitment to run “modest deficits” was a politically clever wedge issue – a pledge the Conservatives did not want to make, and the NDP dared not make. And borrowing in the depths of the COVID-19…

The crucial distinctions the Supreme Court should make about the federal carbon-pricing backstop – Globe and Mail Op-Ed

Against the stark backdrop of intensifying climate change, the Supreme Court will begin hearing arguments on Tuesday concerning the constitutionality of the Greenhouse Gas Pollution Pricing Act – what is known as the federal carbon-pricing backstop.

The hearing comes after a long saga of proceedings through provincial courts of appeal, and the decision will invariably be historic in how it shapes the way our country regulates carbon emissions in the decades to come. In Ontario and Saskatchewan, majority decisions upheld the backstop, finding that Ottawa had jurisdiction for the legislation under the “national concern” branch of the federal peace, order and good government power; in Alberta, the court found that it would…

Membership Application

Interested in becoming a Member of the C.D. Howe Institute? Please fill out the application form below and our team will be in touch with next steps. Note that Membership is subject to approval.

"*" indicates required fields

Please include a brief description, including why you’d like to become a Member.

Member Login

Not a Member yet? Visit our Membership page to learn more and apply.