Garbutt, Harker – Choosing Which “Critical Minerals” Should Be Subsidized Is Problematic
From: Jonathan Garbutt & Michael Harker To: The Honourable Chrystia Freeland, Minister of Finance of Canada Date: March 26, 2024 Re: Choosing Which “Critical Minerals” Should Be Subsidized Is Problematic Finance Canada has proposed amendments via Bill C-59 to the Income Tax Act that expand Canada’s flow-through share (FTS) tax incentive program to include mining projects […] Charles DeLand – Fewer, Stronger Policies Would Help Fill Emissions Investment Gap
To: Natural Resources Minister Jonathan Wilkinson, and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland From: Charles DeLand Date: March 22, 2024 Re: Fewer, Stronger Policies Would Help Fill Emissions Investment Gap Last month, Canada’s Minister of Natural Resources declared he’d like to see more green investment action by industrial greenhouse gas emitters, specifically those in the oilsands. Around the same time, a […] Brian Livingston – The Real Story of the Future of EVs
From: Brian Livingston To: Canadians interested in the future of EVs Date: March 11, 2024 Re: The Real Story of the Future of EVs C.D. Howe Institute author Brian Livingston responds to a critique of his publication. In a recent study for the C.D. Howe Institute, I highlighted the near-impossibility of procuring enough Zero Emission Vehicles […] Faut-il déchirer sa chemise pour Northvolt ? – La Presse
Pas facile de se faire une tête dans ce dossier, où promoteurs et opposants présentent des arguments valables, mais aussi des positions critiquables. Prenons de la hauteur pour en juger.
L’argument central avancé dans ce journal par le ministre de l’Économie, de l’Innovation et de l’Énergie, Pierre Fitzgibbon, est de « développer au Québec une économie basée sur des secteurs d’avenir » et de « réduire notre écart de richesse avec le reste du Canada » pour financer la santé et l’éducation.
Des objectifs louables, certes, mais le gouvernement de la CAQ ne semble appliquer qu’une moitié de la stratégie préconisée pour lutter contre le réchauffement climatique, qui est de s’attaquer tant aux risques…
Lawrence Herman – The Coming War Over Chinese Electric Vehicles
To: Canadian trade watchers From: Lawrence Herman Date: February 15, 2024 Re: The Coming War Over Chinese Electric Vehicles Standing back and looking at today’s global trading picture, one can see that it’s not pretty – destabilized by the wars in Ukraine and Gaza, by the unsettled multilateral situation at the World Trade Organization and by innumerable regional trade disputes. […] Brian Livingston – Ottawa’s Blind EV Optimism
To: The Hon. Steven Guilbeault, Minister of Environment and Climate Change From: Brian Livingston Date: February 14, 2024 Re: Ottawa’s Blind EV optimism By 2035, only zero-emission cars and light trucks can be sold according to the federal government’s recently finalized mandate regulations. That leaves just 11 years and reasonable forecasts of production and sales make clear that […] Ottawa’s EV timeline is way too optimistic – Financial Post
The federal government recently finalized regulations for its “zero-emissions vehicle” mandate. The mandate requires sellers of light vehicles (passenger cars and light trucks) to sell a rising minimum of zero-emissions vehicles — basically, electric vehicles or EVs — every year, culminating with 100 per cent EVs in 2035, just 11 years from now. Reasonable forecasts of production and sales make clear that Ottawa’s timeline is unrealistic.
The mandate states that new light vehicles must be at least 20 per cent EVs in 2026, 60 per cent in 2030 and, as mentioned, 100 per cent in 2035. The theory is that these requirements will guarantee a market for EVs and therefore encourage imports, construction of domestic manufacturing…
Dadson, Waitzer – Who Should Set Provincial Energy Policy?
From: Aleck Dadson and Ed Waitzer To: Canadian regulatory agency observers Date: February 5, 2024 Re: Who Should Set Provincial Energy Policy? Who gets to decide the direction of energy policy in Ontario? The Ontario government itself, led by the Minister of Energy? Or the specialized regulatory agencies that adjudicate rate setting and establish rules […] Time to Reboot: The Federal ZEV Mandate Requires Flexibility
The federal government has proposed regulations requiring the sale of a minimum numbers of Zero Emission Vehicles (ZEVs) in Canada (20 percent of all light vehicles in 2026, ramping up to 60 percent in 2030 and 100 percent in 2035). The flip side of this requirement is that the sale of internal combustion engine (ICE) […] Hodgson, Smallridge – Unlocking Indigenous Financing: Are Loan Guarantees the Answer?
From: Glen Hodgson and Diana Smallridge To: Reconciliation observers Date: January 17, 2024 Re: Unlocking Indigenous financing: are loan guarantees the answer? The federal government’s recent Fall Economic Statement included a commitment to establish a loan guarantee program to foster Indigenous equity ownership in major natural resource sector projects. This offers clear recognition that significant amounts of Indigenous financing […] Carbon pricing needs a makeover – Globe and Mail
Support for Canada’s federal carbon tax for the control of greenhouse gas emissions appears to be crumbling after Ottawa’s decision in the fall to exempt home heating oil from the tax until 2027. Polling by the Angus Reid Institute indicates that two-thirds of Canadians support a further exemption for all home heating fuels, including natural gas, and many (42 per cent) want the carbon tax abolished altogether.
Yet exempting natural gas from the carbon tax, or eliminating the tax altogether, would actually harm most of the households who support the idea. That is because the proceeds from the tax are pooled and then rebated to households in the jurisdiction in which they are collected (the federal carbon tax applies…
Charles DeLand – Plan B, Please, for Federal Carbon Policy
To: Canadians Concerned about Climate Change From: Charles DeLand Date: January 3, 2024 Re: Plan B, Please, for Federal Carbon Policy Suggestions that Canada’s rising emissions prove federal carbon policy is not working miss the mark. The country’s energy efficiency has, in fact, improved considerably under the carbon tax, but rapid population growth means more emissions. Now, unfortunately for […]