Charles DeLand – Alberta Needs a Stable Policy Approach to Power


Putting Together a Holiday Dinner Basket


Leonard Waverman – Why Government Electric Vehicle Mandates Won’t Work


Has Ottawa destroyed its own carbon tax? Canada needs a climate Plan B – Globe and Mail
Suggestions that carbon pricing is not working because Canada’s emissions have kept rising miss the mark, as a large chunk of the increase is due to rapid population growth. The country’s energy efficiency has, in fact, improved considerably under the carbon tax introduced by the federal government.
But unfortunately for carbon price supporters, Ottawa has directly contradicted the principle underlying the tax. In late October, it decided to selectively pause its application to heating oil, a fuel used primarily in homes in Atlantic Canada, ostensibly on affordability grounds, but largely viewed as a cynically political move. Quite logically, provincial leaders immediately asked for exemptions covering fuels used in their regions…
Grant Sprague – Frameworks and Emission Caps: Another No-Consultation Ottawa Initiative


Duncan T. Munn – Nuclear Energy and LNG are Keys to Low-Carbon Canada


Nuclear power and LNG are key to a low-carbon future – Financial Post Op-Ed
The national conversation about net-zero has tended to focus on renewable forms of energy, such as wind and solar, both of which have important roles to play in future. But nuclear energy and liquefied natural gas (LNG) have also emerged as pragmatic drivers on the road toward a low-carbon future. Each has its own unique advantages.
Nuclear stands out as a reliable source of base-load electricity. Unlike wind and solar installations, which produce much less energy than their rated capacities when, respectively, the wind isn’t blowing or the sun shining, nuclear reactors can operate more or less indefinitely at close to capacity output. That ensures a stable energy supply, offsetting the intermittency associated…
Grant Bishop – Ottawa Needs to Get Back to Carbon Pricing Basics


Grant Sprague – The Supreme Court Was Clear: Governments Need to Align on Green Agenda


Charles DeLand – Some Easy Fixes for the New Carbon Capture Tax Credit


Jon Johnson – NAFTA/CUSMA Investor/State Disputes – Fading Away or Out with a Bang


Feds shouldn’t amend the pipeline act without real input from the provinces – Financial Post
Four years ago, the federal government enacted the Impact Assessment Act (IAA), also known as Bill C-69. The reception was not good. In some circles, the legislation became known as the “no-more pipelines bill.” Industry associations, scholars and governments expressed their misgivings with the act and the effects it was likely to have on resource development. This month the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed the act is unconstitutional. Whoops!
The door is not shut on a better approach, however. But Ottawa and the provinces need to work together to achieve it, starting now. In the decision’s conclusion, Chief Justice Wagner wrote: “This scheme plainly overstepped the mark.” What are the key elements that federal policy-makers…