Grant Sprague – Frameworks and Emission Caps: Another No-Consultation Ottawa Initiative


Duncan T. Munn – Nuclear Energy and LNG are Keys to Low-Carbon Canada


Nuclear power and LNG are key to a low-carbon future – Financial Post Op-Ed
The national conversation about net-zero has tended to focus on renewable forms of energy, such as wind and solar, both of which have important roles to play in future. But nuclear energy and liquefied natural gas (LNG) have also emerged as pragmatic drivers on the road toward a low-carbon future. Each has its own unique advantages.
Nuclear stands out as a reliable source of base-load electricity. Unlike wind and solar installations, which produce much less energy than their rated capacities when, respectively, the wind isn’t blowing or the sun shining, nuclear reactors can operate more or less indefinitely at close to capacity output. That ensures a stable energy supply, offsetting the intermittency associated…
Grant Bishop – Ottawa Needs to Get Back to Carbon Pricing Basics


Grant Sprague – The Supreme Court Was Clear: Governments Need to Align on Green Agenda


Charles DeLand – Some Easy Fixes for the New Carbon Capture Tax Credit


Jon Johnson – NAFTA/CUSMA Investor/State Disputes – Fading Away or Out with a Bang


Feds shouldn’t amend the pipeline act without real input from the provinces – Financial Post
Four years ago, the federal government enacted the Impact Assessment Act (IAA), also known as Bill C-69. The reception was not good. In some circles, the legislation became known as the “no-more pipelines bill.” Industry associations, scholars and governments expressed their misgivings with the act and the effects it was likely to have on resource development. This month the Supreme Court of Canada confirmed the act is unconstitutional. Whoops!
The door is not shut on a better approach, however. But Ottawa and the provinces need to work together to achieve it, starting now. In the decision’s conclusion, Chief Justice Wagner wrote: “This scheme plainly overstepped the mark.” What are the key elements that federal policy-makers…
Crystal Gooding – Throwing Money in the Trash? Solutions for Plastic Waste


Charles DeLand – Time to Come Clean on Going Green


Reducing emissions will cost. Governments need to admit that – Financial Post
Ottawa’s policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions will cost Canadians, both directly and indirectly. In 2021, the Royal Bank estimated that reaching net-zero emissions by 2050 could cost as much as $2 trillion — which is almost three-quarters of last year’s entire GDP. We will also need to spend more to protect against a changing climate. To pay for all this, Canada badly needs economic growth.
Though virtually all governments and opposition parties twist themselves into knots to avoid saying it, trying to prevent climate change will cause economic pain. Yes, there will be new “sustainable” jobs and businesses, but the net impact will almost surely be negative. Assigning a price, by tax or regulation, to…
G. Kent Fellows – Renewables Moratorium Risks Harming Alberta’s Investment Climate

